If your employee fails to serve a grievance notice, the NIRC might dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer hasn't experienced a possibility to reply to the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In some cases, the NIRC may well allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to include the grievance notice. However, this is usually only performed Should the employee can show that that they had a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. In the present case, the parties were allowed to guide evidence as well as petitioner company responded on the allegations therefore they were very well aware about the allegations and led the evidence as a result this point is ofno use to generally be seemed into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman Source: Order: Downloads 204 Order Date: 04-FEB-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
How much sway case legislation holds might differ by jurisdiction, and by the precise circumstances on the current case. To explore this concept, think about the following case law definition.
Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. five/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Nasira Khalique Thr. Ms. Seema Khalique V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi CITATION:2025 SHC KHI 46 SHC Citation: SHC-252218 Tag:I have listened to the discovered counsel to the parties and perused the record with their assistance. I intentionally not making any detail comments since the issues with the matter between the parties pending adjudication before the concerned court with regard into the interim relief application in terms of Section 7(1) on the Illegal Dispossession Act 2005 at hand over possession from the subjected premises into the petitioner; that Illegal Dispossession Case needs being decided because of the competent court after hearing the parties if pending because the petitioner has already sought a similar prayer inside the Illegal Dispossession case and as far as the restoration of possession of concerned the trial court must see this element for interim custody of the topic premises if the petitioner was found forcibly evicted from the premises in question if she possessed the valid rent agreement and decision be made within two weeks from the date of receipt of this order.
We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of your information contained on this site, or perhaps the information linked to to the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can make inaccuracies. You should read the full case before counting on it for legal research purposes.
Therefore, this petition is found to become not maintainable and is particularly dismissed along with the pending application(s), plus the petitioners may possibly find remedies through the civil court process as discussed supra. Read more
In order to preserve a uniform enforcement in the laws, the legal system adheres to the doctrine of stare decisis
PLR can be a revolutionizing platform democratizing and making legal research easy and accessible in Pakistan :
168 . H.C.A 203/2016 (D.B.) Saleh Muhammad V/S Faqir Muhammad & others Sindh High Court, Karachi Subject matter: Appeal At times it truly is practical for any Judge to dismiss the suit for non-prosecution, however, a Judge is under the obligation to create an attempt to eliminate a case on benefit and more importantly when after recording of evidence it has reached to the stage of final arguments, endeavors should be made for merit disposal when it has reached this sort of stage. Read more
163 . Const. P. 4965/2023 (D.B.) Saleem Khan V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It is actually nicely-settled that whilst thinking about the case of regular promotion of civil servants, the competent authority has got to think about the advantage of the many qualified candidates and after owing deliberations, to grant promotion to this sort of suitable candidates who will be found being most meritorious among them. Because the petitioner was held to get senior to his colleagues who were promoted in BS-19, the petitioner was dismissed via the respondent department just to increase favor to your blue-eyed candidate based on OPS, which is apathy about the part on the respondent department.
Article 27 on the Constitution does not only safeguard against discrimination within the time of appointment of service but after the appointment also. The disparity from the pay out scale allowances of Stenographers while in the District Judiciary is during the clear negation from the regulation laid down by the Supreme Court in its many pronouncements. Read more
182 . Const. P. 6025/2024 (D.B.) Dr. Pritam Das V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi So far as the stance of the respondents that pensionary benefits might be withheld on account from the allegations leveled against the petitioner, within our view, section 20 on the Sindh Civil Servants Act of 1973 deals with the pension and gratuity that civil servants are entitled to. However, the act does present for certain circumstances under which a civil servant's pension can be withheld or reduced. These consist of if a civil servant is found guilty read more of misconduct or negligence during their service, their pension may be withheld or reduced. If a civil servant is convicted of a serious crime, their pension may very well be withheld or reduced. In certain cases, a civil servant's pension might be withheld or reduced if he/she fails to comply with certain conditions set by the government.
The different roles of case regulation in civil and common legislation traditions create differences in the best way that courts render decisions. Common regulation courts generally explain in detail the legal rationale driving their decisions, with citations of both legislation and previous relevant judgments, and infrequently interpret the wider legal principles.
In determining whether employees of DCFS are entitled to absolute immunity, which is generally held by certain government officials performing within the scope of their employment, the appellate court referred to case regulation previously rendered on similar cases.
The learned Tribunal shall decide the case on merits, without being influenced through the findings during the Impugned order, after recording of evidence of your respective parties. Read more